There are a lot of false Doctrines but here are Doctrines of demons of the sinagog of satan ashkenaz (fake joo) refuted, that are supposed to subversively slant Christianity, that People without awareness of the subversive Slant buy the Corruption by the sinagog of satan ashkenaz. The Operation Mode of the sinagog of satan is hiv, once the Body lets the Virus in, the defense System gets shut down for the Virus to use the Body to multiply to Destroy it from within. Only by the Word of God a Christian will be Immune against the sinagog of satan aids.
Rom 11:28 KJV As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. Does Ro.11.28 mean a Christian has to condone or tolerate when "jooz" teach false Doctrines for their filthy Lucre's Sake and blaspheme as many so called "zionists" claim? NO !!!!! If you have the Integrity as a Christian, your patriotic Duty is to stop the ("joo") mouth of those of the Circumcision (Tit.1.10) who teach false Doctrine for their filthy Lucre's Sake (Tit.1.11), rebuke the "joo" sharply (Tit.1.13) not giving heed to jooish Fables (Tit.1.14) ! Only demented Perverts say "let it go" when "jooz" blaspheme, claiming those "jooz" were the "Elect". Not only cussing jooish mouths must be stopped as Tit.1.10-11 commands, if it was ok for the elect People to blaspheme or teach Doctrine of Demons, then it would be ok for former Gentiles to blaspheme and teach wrong, since the Elect are not coming out from jooz alone but from Gentile Nations too, according Col 3:12 KJV Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering; The Elect mentioned in Col.3.12 are former Gentiles, because the Writer of Col. is the Apostel to Gentiles according Rom 11:13 KJV For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: Will you obey Tit.1.10-14 or will you deny God by Dissobediance (Tit.1.16) ?
Origins Of The Pretribulation Rapture Doctrine
The Author of the pretrib Doctrine wants you to condone jooz antiChristianizm, giving a false idea after Rapture there would be a second chance for jooz to get saved. Today is the Day for Salvation and when Christ comes back there will be Judgement. Lacunza, a jooish rabbi, disguised himself as a converted Catholic, that is a joo who converted to Catholicism, and he wrote a book called "the coming of messiah in glory". In the book, he suggested a secret coming of Jesus before the second coming. Edward Irving translated that book from Spanish to English, and began to preach the lie. John Nelson Darby absorbed it and taught it to C.I. Scofield, who put it into his reference Bible. It then was embraced by DWight Moody of the Moody Bible institute, and the Dallas Theillogical Seminary. Lacunza's stage name was "Rabbi Ben Ezra". He posed as a Jesuit. Edward Irving Rabbi ben Ezra www.velocity.net/~edju/Pretrib4.htm
(Part 4: The Birth Of The Pretribulation Doctrine In The 1800s)
One Verse is not a whole Doctrine but sometimes one Verse refutes a whole Doctrine, Rev.7.14 is such a Verse that refutes the pretriubaltion rapture Idea. Rev 7:14 KJV And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. To come out of Something, someone must have gone through it before. They must have gone through the great Tribulation to come out of it, which means they were not raptured before the great Tribulation. Mat.24.29 mentions the time after the Tribulation, after the Tribulation (Verse 31) the Dead will raise and the alive remaining Saints will be changed with the great Sound of a Trumpet, that is when the Saints will be raptured (in greek harpazo) according 1.Thes.4.16-17 and 1.Cor.15.52.
Here is an Audio Sermon on Post Tribulation Rapture. I don't necessarily agree wth everything from apostasywatch.com but with their Sermon about Rapture, to hear below:
www.apostasywatch.com/TeachingDiscipleship/MostRecentFreeAudio/2007AudioArchive/tabid/199/Default.aspx * http://www.answeringtheapostasy.net/Sermons.php
mid Acts dispensationalizms other Gospel
mid acts dispensationalists claim Apostel Paul -God bless his Soul- had another Gospel than Apostel Peter. Apostel Paul does not have another Gospel than Apostel Peter because Apostel Paul writes to the same Persons as Apostel Peter does according 2.Peter.3.15 (KJV): "And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;" When I brought 2.Pe.3.15 up in a mid acts disp. Chatroom, my text was blocked by "gracifidiesaint", then she said it was a "transient" writing but the very next Verse refutes her Statement: 2.Peter3:16 (KJV) "As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction." Look again at the Passage "hath written unto you as also in all his epistels", that means same People are addressed with the same Writings, Apostel Paul and Apostel Peter preached the same Gospel. When the Apostels preach the same Gospel, there cant be any other Way for Salvation, accordingly there is only one Way for all. Gal 1:8 KJV But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
mid Acts dispensationalizms rejection of Jesus Christ
mid Acts dispensationalism claims the Commands by Jesus Christ were for Israel but not for the Church. Apostel Paul writes in Gal.3.29 that if ye be Chrits's ye are Abrahams Seed and Abrahams Seed is Israel according Is.41.8. That means since the Church is Israel, the Commands by Jesus Christ are for each and every Believer in Jesus Christ right now. Even if the Commandments by Jesus Christ were for Israel only but not for the Church, the Command by Jesus Christ in Math.28.19 to his Disciples to baptize is to baptize the Nations. It is a wrong claim to say Jesus Christ didnt came for the Gentiles, because the Command by Jesus Christ to baptize applies to Gentile Nations too, all Nations. Once someone is baptized into Christ, he or she has put on Christ according Gal.3.27, that is how someone becomes Christ's and a Seed of Abraham (Gal.3.29), that is an Israelite (Is.41.8). mid acts disp is an attempt not only to deny that Christians are Israel for a political propaganda purpose for worldly zionizm, their teaching to not follow Christ is anti Christian.
Eph 2:11-13 KJV Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; (12) That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: (13) But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. Jesus Christ says he came only for the lost Sheep of the House of Israel in Mat.15.24 -aVerse the mid acts dispis like to quote- and the same Jesus Christ mentions "other Sheep" in John10.16 who are not of the same Fold but who will also be brought in by Jesus Christ that there shall be one Fold of Sheep (not two Folds) with one Shepperd Jesus Christ (not two Shepperds). Those who were "time past Gentiles" (Eph.2.11) and alienated from the Commonwealths of Israel (Eph.2.12) are now made nigh by Christ (Eph.2.13), the Gentiles were the other Sheep but by Christ they have become identical with Israel, the Sheep Fold Israel.